DNC “Russian” hack was “proven” by associate of Rice/Farkas; FBI and NSA never examined servers

Susan Rice and Dr. Evelyn Farkas have so much in common.

Both served in the Barack Obama administration, Rice at State and Farkas at Defense. Both are in the news – Farkas’ remarks about the “alleged” Russian hacking of Democratic National Committee (DNC) servers, and Rice’s unmasking of private American’s names in government surveillance.

Both have been leaders in the Atlantic Council, which hates Russia almost as much as Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). Other council honchos include Henry Kissinger, Brent Snowcroft and Madeleine Albright – globalists all. The Council is a big deal in war hawk circles, but there is something peculiar. It is financed not only by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Inc., the U.S. State Department,  NATO ACT, it has been funded by the Ploughshares Fund, which has received its money from billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.

And both Rice and Farkas have served on the Atlantic Council alongside Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder of CrowdStrike, the third-party company hired by the DNC and allowed by the FBI to make its assessment about alleged Russian hacking into the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Dimitri was named in 2013 as one of Foreign Policy’s Top 100 Leading Global Thinkers, along with other globalists, including Angela Merkel, John Kerry, Ben Bernanke and Jeff Bezos.

In April last year, officials at the DNC noticed that their dossiers on Donald Trump had been hacked, along with other material, and they first went to the lawyers for advice. The next day, they called on CrowdStrike, which put together a document released in June that asserted there was some Russian hacking attacks on the servers, not necessarily resulting in the loss of particular data. It is not clear if they investigated the more logical conclusion that spies inside the DNC stole the thousands of documents.

When Wikileaks began publishing the damning material about how the DNC colluded with media and worked against Sen. Bernie Sanders, Dem leaders asserted that Russians stole the data and gave it to Julian Assange to influence the Presidential election in favor of Trump. That drumbeat has continued , despite the history of Wikileaks receiving its leaks directly from undercover sources like Edward Snowden and the late male, Bradley Manning, and not from many hours-long downloads from hacked systems.

But, both some Republicans and most Democrats still maintain publicly that the Russians interfered with the election by stealing information from the DNC. The only proof of that claim is the assertion that hackers, who might be associated with Russia, attacked the servers.

Indeed, we are told that 17 intelligence agencies share that conclusion. And then there is that steaming Russian Dossier.

But who checked the findings of CrowdStrike?

The answer is – Nobody.

Last month, FBI Director James Comey said that his agency, never had direct access to the DNC servers to confirm the hacking.

Well, we never got direct access to the machines themselves… the DNC in the spring of 2016 hired a firm (CrowdStrike) that ultimately shared with us their forensics from their review of the system.”

Comey said the bureau asked for access, but it was never allowed.

National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers also said the NSA didn’t even ask for access to the DNC hardware:

The NSA didn’t ask for access. That’s not in our job.

The joint conclusion of the “17 agencies” is solely the result of the findings of the NSA and FBI, and neither of them touched the DNC servers, and instead relied only on the firm hired by the DNC and headed by an official of the Atlantic Council.

How convenient that the damning material released on the DNC was hacked by a foreign enemy, not a disgruntled staffer. If it had been an inside job all the focus would have been on the obvious corruption, not how it was exposed.

 Unfortunately, it is not enforced when it pertains to Jews